Mental health charities in England are facing increasing challenges in managing the growing number of patients referred by GPs, with concerns rising over the competence of underqualified professionals treating the most vulnerable individuals. As demand continues to surge, experts and professionals have raised alarms about the potential risks to patient care due to a lack of regulation and oversight within some charitable services.
In a discussion with The Guardian, mental health experts expressed that GPs, overwhelmed by limited mental health support options, are often forced to “signpost” patients to charitable organizations that may not be equipped to handle complex mental health needs. These services, often provided by unregulated charities, employ practitioners who may not always have the necessary qualifications or expertise to effectively treat patients.
Jaime Craig, the incoming chair of the Association of Clinical Psychologists, highlighted that patients are increasingly directed to services through flyers or websites, leaving them unaware of whether the help they are receiving is from a qualified professional. “The issue is that people are desperate,” said Craig. “Limited access to services pushes them to seek alternatives, but without proper vetting, how can they know if the support offered is legitimate?”
The Guardian has previously reported on the lack of regulation in the mental health sector, where anyone can practice as a psychotherapist or counselor with little to no formal qualifications. The absence of clear standards has raised concerns over the effectiveness and safety of treatment provided by these unregulated professionals.
Dr. Jon Van Niekerk, chair of the general adult faculty at the Royal College of Psychiatrists, emphasized the importance of referring patients to services that can adequately meet their needs, with care provided by qualified professionals. While recognizing the valuable role of charities and community organizations, he stressed that they should complement, rather than replace, specialist mental health care when necessary.
The situation was further illustrated by the experience of Amercine Maneely, whose daughter, diagnosed with autism and avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID), was referred by an NHS dietician to a local eating disorder charity, First Steps ED. Maneely, a former psychiatric nurse, was alarmed to discover that the support officers providing one-on-one support to her daughter were not qualified psychotherapists or counselors, raising concerns about the potential risks of continuing with unqualified support.
The charity, First Steps ED, defended its approach, stating that its support officers, though not psychotherapists, had accredited training. The CEO, Daniel Magson, explained that the charity’s services were designed to offer timely support in areas where waiting lists for other services were prohibitively long. Despite the lack of formal psychotherapy qualifications, the charity claims that its service is both accessible and affordable, and patients can opt for it in lieu of more costly private therapy.
The reliance on third-sector organizations by the NHS also places significant pressure on charities themselves. One such charity, Counselling in the Community in Blackpool, reported that about half of the patients it sees are referred by GPs who are unable to access NHS-funded talking therapies. While the charity ensures that its staff have appropriate training, the lack of financial support from the NHS raises concerns about the sustainability of relying on charities to fill the gap in mental health services.
Stuart Hutton-Brown, who runs Counselling in the Community, pointed out that without direct funding or financial support from the NHS, charities are left to shoulder a disproportionate burden of mental health care. Hutton-Brown has appealed to the all-party parliamentary group (APPG) on mental health to address these challenges, as charity-run services become increasingly important in alleviating pressure on the already overstretched NHS.
Chris Webb, MP for Blackpool and a member of the mental health APPG, echoed Hutton-Brown’s concerns, attributing the reliance on charities to the inadequacy of mental health services in the country. He argued that outsourcing mental health care to charities highlights the failure of the state to meet the growing demand for support, especially following years of austerity.
As mental health charities continue to face overwhelming demand and pressure, the lack of proper regulation, funding, and qualified professionals poses significant challenges to patient safety and the quality of care. The situation underscores the urgent need for reform in the mental health sector to ensure that all patients receive the appropriate care they need from properly trained and regulated professionals.
Related topics:
